That’s outrageous. Just because someone is in the public eye (and happens to be massively successful) doesn’t give “journalists” the right to speculate on any area of their life, if it isn’t actually in the public interest. Kylie is a gay icon but is clearly not, herself, gay.
Compare coverage of Andrew Windsor, who has, seemingly, done very bad things, which the public do need to know because he receives public money.
That’s outrageous. Just because someone is in the public eye (and happens to be massively successful) doesn’t give “journalists” the right to speculate on any area of their life, if it isn’t actually in the public interest. Kylie is a gay icon but is clearly not, herself, gay.
Compare coverage of Andrew Windsor, who has, seemingly, done very bad things, which the public do need to know because he receives public money.
Thank you, Mic.
Thanks, Suze.
Excellent piece, Mic; it’s the holier-than-thou tone of the article as well as the hatchet job that disgusts me. Will post on X
Thank you, Liz. Yes, there was something particularly aggrieving about the tone.
On reflection, I’d say not so much holier-than-thou as full of snide innuendo & puerile rhetorical questions, not unlike hit pieces in the daily fail.
Great piece.